DeepSeek V3.2 explained: sparse attention, benchmarks and what replaced it

If you shipped anything against DeepSeek’s API in late 2025, you almost certainly ran into DeepSeek V3.2. Its experimental predecessor, V3.2-Exp, arrived on 29 September 2025 with DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) and an API price cut of more than 50%; the official V3.2 followed on 1 December 2025 as its successor. On 24 April 2026 the DeepSeek-V4 preview reached the API and the lineup changed again — today DeepSeek’s API serves deepseek-flash and deepseek-v4-pro. This article covers what V3.2 actually was (architecturally, not in marketing terms), how it scored against V3.1-Terminus, what it cost on the API, and what changes if you are moving an old integration to today’s models.
What DeepSeek V3.2 is (and where it sits now)

DeepSeek V3.2 is an open-weight mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model released by DeepSeek on 1 December 2025, with code and weights on Hugging Face under the MIT License. DeepSeek’s release note calls it the “official successor to V3.2-Exp”, and it was the model behind DeepSeek’s API until the V4 preview launched on 24 April 2026. The headline architectural change versus V3.1-Terminus is a single one: per the V3.2 technical report, “DeepSeek-V3.2 uses exactly the same architecture as DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp”, and compared with V3.1-Terminus “the only architectural modification” is the introduction of DeepSeek Sparse Attention through continued training.
V3.2 is now a previous generation. According to DeepSeek’s API Change Log, deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner were upgraded to V3.2’s non-thinking and thinking modes on 1 December 2025; on 24 April 2026 both names were pointed to deepseek-v4-flash (itself now a legacy name served by DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017), with retirement scheduled for 2026-07-24 15:59 UTC, and they are no longer listed in DeepSeek’s docs. The API now offers deepseek-flash (DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017) and deepseek-v4-pro (DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813). See the full lineup on the DeepSeek models hub.
Architecture and lineage
V3.2 was built by continued training from a DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus checkpoint, so it keeps the MoE backbone that ran from V3 through V3.1 — listed on the V3.1 model card as 671B total parameters with 37B activated per token and a 128K context. What is new is how attention is computed.
DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA)
Classical transformer attention is quadratic: every token attends to every other token, so doubling the sequence length quadruples the compute. Per the V3.2 report, the DSA prototype consists of two components — a lightning indexer and a fine-grained token selection mechanism. The lightning indexer computes an index score between the current query token and each preceding token, determining which tokens the query should attend to. Only the key-value entries with the top-k index scores feed the main attention step (the official inference config sets k to 2,048). DSA reduces the main model’s core attention complexity from quadratic O(L²) to O(Lk), where k (≪ L) is the number of selected tokens; the indexer itself is still O(L²) but, the report says, needs far less computation than the MLA attention in V3.1-Terminus.
DeepSeek kept the training recipe deliberately conservative to isolate the architectural effect. The V3.2-Exp model card says DSA delivers “substantial improvements in long-context training and inference efficiency while maintaining virtually identical model output quality”, and that its training configurations were deliberately aligned with V3.1-Terminus to evaluate the impact. V3.2 then added a scaled reinforcement-learning post-training phase — the report puts the post-training compute budget at more than 10% of pre-training cost — on top of the same architecture.
Variants shipped under the V3.2 name
- DeepSeek-V3.2 — the general model served on
deepseek-chat(non-thinking) anddeepseek-reasoner(thinking) from 1 December 2025 until 24 April 2026. - DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp — the 29 September 2025 experimental predecessor, which DeepSeek described as an intermediate step toward its next-generation architecture, built to validate DSA’s efficiency gains.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale — a high-compute reasoning variant. API-only at launch (its weights were also published on Hugging Face), it was served via a temporary endpoint until 15 December 2025, 15:59 UTC, at the same price as V3.2 and without tool calls, “to support community evaluation & research”.
Context, licensing and release timeline
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | MoE with Multi-Head Latent Attention + DeepSeek Sparse Attention |
| Total parameters | 671B total / 37B active (V3.1 backbone; the official inference config is named config_671B_v3.2.json) |
| Context window | 128K tokens |
| V3.2-Exp release | 2025-09-29 |
| V3.2 official release | 2025-12-01 |
| On DeepSeek’s API | V3.2-Exp from 2025-09-29, V3.2 from 2025-12-01, until the V4 preview on 2026-04-24 |
| Code and weights license | MIT |
| Download size | About 689.5 GB (current files in the DeepSeek-V3.2 repository, 26 Oct 2026) |
For the older base model V3.2 descends from, see DeepSeek V3. For the models that replaced it, see DeepSeek V4.
Benchmarks: V3.2 vs V3.1-Terminus and the Speciale headline

DeepSeek designed V3.2-Exp as an architectural ablation: the point was to show parity with V3.1-Terminus while the attention cost dropped, not to claim new highs. The numbers below are DeepSeek-reported, from the V3.2-Exp model card (September 2025; SWE-Bench Verified and BrowseComp are from the card’s agentic tool-use section, the others from reasoning mode without tool use).
| Benchmark | V3.1-Terminus | V3.2-Exp | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 85.0 | 85.0 | Unchanged |
| AIME 2025 | 88.4 | 89.3 | Small rise; HMMT 2025 dipped from 86.1 to 83.6 |
| Codeforces rating | 2046 | 2121 | Competitive-programming rating improved |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 68.4 | 67.8 | Essentially level; BrowseComp rose from 38.5 to 40.1 |
The December V3.2 release then pushed further. The V3.2 technical report (arXiv 2512.02556) says V3.2 “performs comparably to GPT-5”, and that the high-compute V3.2-Speciale “surpasses GPT-5” and reasons on par with Gemini-3.0-Pro, with gold-medal performance in IMO 2025 and IOI 2025; DeepSeek’s release note adds gold-level results at CMO and the ICPC World Finals. Selected numbers from the report’s tables (all DeepSeek-reported, thinking mode):
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2 | V3.2-Speciale | GPT-5 High (same table) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025 (Pass@1) | 93.1 | 96.0 | 94.6 |
| HMMT Feb 2025 (Pass@1) | 92.5 | 99.2 | 88.3 |
| LiveCodeBench (Pass@1-COT) | 83.3 | 88.7 | 84.5 |
| Codeforces rating | 2386 | 2701 | 2537 |
| SWE-Bench Verified (Resolved) | 73.1 | — | 74.9 |
The report also notes that Speciale reaches these scores with longer outputs than V3.2, and that V3.2 itself still trails frontier closed models such as Gemini-3.0-Pro on breadth of world knowledge and token efficiency.
Strengths — where V3.2 actually won
- Long-context economics. DSA’s O(Lk) core attention is the whole point. The V3.2 report estimates per-token costs from DeepSeek’s H800 deployment and shows V3.2’s cost rising far more slowly with token position than V3.1-Terminus’s.
- Agentic tool-use. DeepSeek’s 1 December 2025 release note calls V3.2 its “first model to integrate thinking directly into tool-use”, with tool calls supported in both thinking and non-thinking modes. That combination made it a credible open choice for agent frameworks.
- Price. The V3.2-Exp release on 29 September 2025 came with an API price cut of more than 50%, and the December V3.2 release kept those rates (see the pricing snapshot below).
- Open weights. MIT-licensed weights meant you could self-host the same model DeepSeek served on its API, which matters for regulated or air-gapped environments. See is DeepSeek open source for the licensing detail per release.
Weaknesses — where it fell short
- Context ceiling. 128K was generous in late 2025, but today’s
deepseek-flashanddeepseek-v4-prooffer a 1M-token context with up to 384K output tokens. The V3.2 report itself notes that roughly 20% or more of its search-agent test cases exceeded the 128K limit. - No image input. V3.2 is a text model; for vision you needed DeepSeek VL2. (On today’s API,
deepseek-flashaccepts images.) - Custom inference kernels. DSA is not a drop-in attention backend. DeepSeek released new kernels alongside the model — TileLang reference kernels, indexer kernels in DeepGEMM and sparse-attention kernels in FlashMLA — and on 17 November 2025 it flagged a RoPE layout discrepancy in the indexer of its earlier inference demo code that could degrade performance, so self-hosters on the old demo code had to update.
- Speciale’s tool-use gap. The Speciale reasoning variant did not support tool calls during its temporary endpoint window, so agentic workloads had to stay on standard V3.2.
How to access V3.2 today
DeepSeek V3.2 remains available as open weights, but DeepSeek no longer serves it: it is not on the current pricing page, and the official web and app models were updated to DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on 17 October 2026, per the Change Log. Your options:
- Official API (current models only). Chat requests hit
POST /chat/completions, the OpenAI-compatible endpoint athttps://api.deepseek.com. The API is stateless — clients must resend the entire conversation history on every request. V3.2-era code that calleddeepseek-chatordeepseek-reasonerneeds to move todeepseek-flashordeepseek-v4-pro; DeepSeek’s own guidance is to “change the model name todeepseek-flash” and keep the base URL. See DeepSeek API documentation. - Self-host. Download the weights (about 689.5 GB of files) from Hugging Face and serve with vLLM or SGLang. V3.2 shares V3.2-Exp’s model structure, and the V3.2-Exp card gives the SGLang launch command
python -m sglang.launch_server --model deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp --tp 8 --dp 8 --enable-dp-attention; vLLM provided day-0 support for V3.2-Exp. For local use, the V3.2 card recommendstemperature = 1.0, top_p = 0.95. Hardware planning matters — start at the DeepSeek hardware calculator.
Pricing snapshot
V3.2’s API rates were $0.028 per million input tokens on a cache hit, $0.28 on a cache miss and $0.42 per million output tokens, a single rate at all hours (DeepSeek’s pricing page listed no off-peak tier in that period). DeepSeek’s V3.2-Exp release note gives these rates as effective from 10:00 UTC on 29 September 2025, down from $0.07 / $0.56 / $1.68, and Wayback Machine captures of DeepSeek’s pricing page (11 October 2025, 12 January and 11 April 2026) show them unchanged through the V3.2 period. These are historical rates; V3.2 is no longer on the pricing page.
Today’s deepseek-flash does not undercut V3.2 across the board. As of October 2026 it costs $0.006 (peak) / $0.003 (off-peak) per million cache-hit input tokens, $0.30 / $0.15 per million cache-miss input tokens and $1.20 / $0.60 per million output tokens; deepseek-v4-pro costs $0.044 / $0.022, $1.32 / $0.66 and $3.96 / $1.98. Off-peak rates are half of peak; peak hours are 01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC, Monday to Friday, excluding Chinese public holidays. Check the DeepSeek API pricing guide and the DeepSeek pricing calculator before you quote costs to a stakeholder.
Worked example — V3.2’s old rates vs deepseek-flash today
1,000,000 API calls with a 2,000-token cached system prompt, a 200-token uncached user message and a 300-token response — 2,000M cache-hit input tokens, 200M cache-miss input tokens and 300M output tokens:
| Bucket | V3.2 (historical, single rate) | deepseek-flash peak |
deepseek-flash off-peak |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cache-hit input (2,000M) | 2,000 × $0.028 = $56.00 | 2,000 × $0.006 = $12.00 | 2,000 × $0.003 = $6.00 |
| Cache-miss input (200M) | 200 × $0.28 = $56.00 | 200 × $0.30 = $60.00 | 200 × $0.15 = $30.00 |
| Output (300M) | 300 × $0.42 = $126.00 | 300 × $1.20 = $360.00 | 300 × $0.60 = $180.00 |
| Total | $238.00 | $432.00 | $216.00 |
For this output-heavy mix, deepseek-flash at peak costs more than V3.2 did, because its output rate is higher; off-peak it comes in slightly below. Enumerating all three buckets matters — the user message on every call is still a cache miss against the cached system prefix, so leaving that line out understates real spend.
Best use cases
V3.2’s strengths mapped neatly to a handful of roles. If you are picking a model today, these are the workloads where V3.2’s open weights (or today’s deepseek-flash and deepseek-v4-pro) fit:
- Long-document analysis. Contracts, filings, codebases — see DeepSeek for legal research.
- Research assistance. Synthesising across papers and sources — see DeepSeek for research.
- Coding agents. Thinking-mode + tool-use is a workable agent loop — see DeepSeek for coding.
- RAG backends. Open weights + DSA favour RAG setups with large retrieved contexts — see the DeepSeek RAG tutorial.
Comparable alternatives
DeepSeek’s own V3.2 report compared it with Claude-4.5-Sonnet, GPT-5 High and Gemini-3.0-Pro among closed models, and with Kimi-K2-Thinking and MiniMax M2 among open models that support thinking in tool use. For structured comparisons: DeepSeek vs ChatGPT, DeepSeek vs Claude, and the broader DeepSeek alternatives roundup.
Verdict

DeepSeek V3.2 did what DeepSeek said it would: it kept V3.1-Terminus quality on DeepSeek’s benchmarks, brought sparse attention and a price cut of more than half to the API, and seeded the agentic tool-use and scaled-RL patterns that later models built on. It was the model behind DeepSeek’s API from December 2025 until April 2026 (with V3.2-Exp from late September). It is not the model to start a new integration on today — DeepSeek no longer serves it, so move hosted workloads to deepseek-flash or deepseek-v4-pro, keeping the same base_url and changing only the model field, or self-host the MIT weights if you specifically need V3.2.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V3.2 still the current model?
No. The DeepSeek-V4 preview replaced V3.2 on the API on 24 April 2026, and the API now serves deepseek-flash (DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017) and deepseek-v4-pro (DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813). V3.2 weights remain downloadable under MIT on Hugging Face. The legacy IDs that used to route to V3.2 were pointed to deepseek-v4-flash in April 2026 and were scheduled for retirement on 2026-07-24 15:59 UTC. For current options, see DeepSeek V4 or the DeepSeek latest updates feed.
What does DeepSeek Sparse Attention actually do?
DSA replaces dense attention with a two-step process: a lightning indexer scores preceding tokens, then a fine-grained selector keeps only the top-k for the main attention calculation. This moves core attention cost from quadratic to O(Lk) in sequence length with, per DeepSeek, virtually identical output quality — and DeepSeek paired its arrival in V3.2-Exp with an API price cut of more than 50%. More in the DeepSeek research papers roundup.
How do I migrate from deepseek-chat or deepseek-reasoner to V4?
Change one line: set model="deepseek-flash" (the default choice, and the only current model with image input) or model="deepseek-v4-pro". The base_url stays at https://api.deepseek.com. Thinking mode is on by default on both models; set reasoning_effort to low, high or max, or pass extra_body={"thinking": {"type": "disabled"}} for the old deepseek-chat-style non-thinking behaviour. Walkthrough: DeepSeek API getting started.
Can I still run DeepSeek V3.2 locally?
Yes. Weights are MIT-licensed on Hugging Face (about 689.5 GB of files), and vLLM and SGLang both support DSA. The official SGLang launch command uses 8-way tensor parallelism (--tp 8), with Docker images for H200, MI350 and NPUs, so this is multi-GPU server territory. Check the requirements first at DeepSeek system requirements and the setup path in install DeepSeek locally.
Does V3.2 support thinking mode and tool-use together?
Yes — this was one of V3.2’s notable additions. DeepSeek described V3.2 as its first model to integrate thinking directly into tool-use, and it supports tool-use in both thinking and non-thinking modes. The Speciale variant was the exception: it ran without tool calls during its temporary endpoint window. For a deeper look at reasoning-capable DeepSeek models, see DeepSeek R1.
Sources & Methodology
Primary sources
- OfficialDeepSeek API documentationEndpoints, request/response shape, model IDsLast checked: October 26, 2026
- PricingDeepSeek API pricing pagePer-1M-token rates, billing units, cache-hit pricingLast checked: October 26, 2026
- Model cardDeepSeek on Hugging FaceWeights, license, usage notes per modelLast checked: October 26, 2026
- Model cardDeepSeek-V3.2 model card on Hugging FaceMIT licence, Speciale no tool calls, sampling recommendations; file size (checked 26 Oct 2026)Last checked: October 26, 2026
- Model cardDeepSeek V3.2-Exp model card on Hugging FaceV3.2-Exp vs V3.1-Terminus benchmark table, SGLang command, kernels, 17 Nov 2025 RoPE noteLast checked: October 26, 2026
- Official documentationDeepSeek API Change Logdeepseek-chat / deepseek-reasoner history (V3.2-Exp, V3.2, V4 preview, retirement date)Last checked: October 26, 2026
- Official newsDeepSeek-V3.2 release note (1 Dec 2025)Release date, Speciale endpoint, thinking in tool-useLast checked: October 26, 2026
- Official newsDeepSeek-V3.2-Exp release note (29 Sep 2025)DSA launch, 50%+ API price cut and the V3.2-era rates ($0.028 / $0.28 / $0.42, effective 29 Sep 2025)Last checked: October 26, 2026
Technical references
- Technical reportDeepSeek-V3 technical report (arXiv:2412.19437)V3 architecture and training methodologyLast checked: October 26, 2026
- Technical reportDeepSeek-R1 paper (arXiv:2501.12948)R1 reasoning approach, distillation resultsLast checked: October 26, 2026
- BenchmarkSWE-Bench Verified leaderboardSoftware-engineering benchmark scoresLast checked: October 26, 2026
- BenchmarkLiveCodeBenchLive coding benchmark scoresLast checked: October 26, 2026
- Technical reportDeepSeek V3.2 technical report (arXiv 2512.02556)DSA design and complexity, benchmark tables, limitationsLast checked: October 26, 2026
Methodology
Architecture, parameter counts, context window, and license were checked against the official DeepSeek model card and the corresponding technical report. Benchmark figures are reproduced as they appear in vendor materials and are treated as directional indicators rather than guarantees of real-world performance.
Data confidence
High for official architecture and license; medium for vendor-reported benchmarks; low for projected future capabilities.
Editorial note
Vendor-reported figures are not always independently replicated. Benchmarks at the frontier change quickly; expect this article to need a refresh whenever DeepSeek, OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google ship a new model.
