Is DeepSeek Open Source? A Clear Look at Licensing in 2026

Is DeepSeek open source? See which models ship MIT weights, what the license allows, and how to deploy V4 today. Check the full breakdown.

Guides·April 23, 2026·By DS Guide Editorial
Is DeepSeek open source title card: eyebrow 'Guide · Open source', title 'Is DeepSeek Open Source?', tagline 'V4 + R1: MIT for code and weights. Older models: split license.', and four stats: V4 MIT both, R1 MIT both, V3 base DS Lic + MIT code, and VL2 DS Lic + MIT code, beside a scales illustration.

Short answer, up front: yes, DeepSeek open source releases are real, and the current generation — DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, the two models behind DeepSeek’s API today — ships both weights and code under the MIT License. But “open source” in AI is a term people use loosely, and older DeepSeek models (V3 base, Coder-V2, VL2) split a permissive code license from a more restrictive weights license. If you plan to fine-tune, self-host or ship a commercial product on top of DeepSeek, those differences matter.

This guide walks through exactly what’s open as of October 2026, what each license allows, where to download the weights, and what trade-offs still apply compared with closed APIs from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.

Is DeepSeek open source? The short answer

Table titled 'DeepSeek open source — what's open per model': V4-Pro / V4-Flash MIT code and MIT weights; V3.2 / V3.1 / R1 MIT and MIT; V3 (original) MIT code and DeepSeek Model License weights; Coder V2 / VL2 MIT code and DeepSeek Model License weights.

Yes — with caveats worth knowing. DeepSeek publishes its models as open-weight releases on Hugging Face, and every recent release (V4.1-Flash-1017, V4-Pro-0813, V4.1-Flash, V3.2, V3.1, R1) carries the MIT License on both code and weights. DeepSeek the company runs a paid API and a free chat app, but the underlying models are downloadable, forkable and commercially usable.

That makes DeepSeek’s recent releases more permissive than Meta’s Llama 4, whose community license requires companies with more than 700 million monthly active users to request a separate license from Meta, and more open than OpenAI’s GPT-5, Anthropic’s Claude and Google’s Gemini models, whose weights are not published. It does not automatically make every DeepSeek artefact MIT-licensed — some older model weights sit under a separate custom license. The table below shows the split; always check the Hugging Face repo for the specific model you plan to ship.

DeepSeek licensing, per model

There are two licenses in play across the DeepSeek catalogue:

  • MIT License — a short, permissive license that allows commercial use, modification, redistribution and sublicensing, as long as the copyright and permission notice is kept in all copies or substantial portions.
  • DeepSeek Model License (DeepSeek License Agreement, version 1.0, 23 October 2023) — a custom license with use-based restrictions (Attachment A lists, for example, unlawful use, military use and harming minors) but otherwise broad freedoms; the model cards of V3, Coder-V2 and VL2 each state that the series supports commercial use.

Here is where each major model lands, as stated on its Hugging Face repo (checked 24 October 2026):

Model Release Code license Weights license
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 (deepseek-flash on the API) 2026-10-17 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 2026-09-10 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (deepseek-v4-pro on the API) 2026-08-13 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 2026-07-31 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V4-Pro and V4-Flash (April 2026 preview) 2026-04-24 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V3.2 2025-12 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V3.1 2025-08 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V3-0324 2025-03 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-R1 2025-01 MIT MIT
DeepSeek-V3 (original base/chat) 2024-12 MIT DeepSeek Model License
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 2024 MIT DeepSeek Model License
DeepSeek-VL2 2024 MIT DeepSeek Model License

For the current models, the Hugging Face cards for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 state plainly that the repository and model weights are licensed under the MIT License. The same is true for R1: DeepSeek’s January 2025 launch notes said code and models were released under the MIT License (“Distill & commercialize freely!”), and the R1 card adds that the R1 series supports commercial use and allows modifications and derivative works, including distillation for training other LLMs.

What MIT actually grants you

For MIT-licensed releases such as V4.1-Flash-1017, V4-Pro-0813 and R1, MIT means you can:

  • Download the weights and run them on your own hardware.
  • Fine-tune them on proprietary data and keep the result private.
  • Serve the model to paying customers without a royalty or revenue share.
  • Distill them into smaller models — the R1 card names distillation explicitly.
  • Redistribute modified versions under other terms, including proprietary ones.

The one hard requirement is keeping the MIT copyright and permission notice in all copies or substantial portions. If you are auditing DeepSeek privacy and data handling for a contract, note that the license covers the weights you run yourself; the hosted chat and API are governed by DeepSeek’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy instead.

What the DeepSeek Model License adds

For older weights (V3 base/chat, Coder-V2, VL2), the DeepSeek Model License still permits commercial deployment and derivative work, but layers in use-based restrictions. Its Attachment A rules out, among other things, use that violates applicable law, military use in any way, exploiting or harming minors, generating false information to harm others, defamation or harassment, fully automated decision-making that adversely affects someone’s legal rights, and discrimination based on legally protected characteristics. Section III requires anyone who distributes the model or a derivative to include the same use-based restrictions as an enforceable provision and to tell downstream users about them.

Where to download DeepSeek weights

DeepSeek publishes official weights on two platforms:

  • Hugging Face — the primary distribution channel under deepseek-ai/, for example deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and the entire back-catalogue.
  • ModelScope — the Chinese-hosted equivalent, useful if Hugging Face is slow from your region. DeepSeek’s 17 October 2026 release notes link both platforms for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.

Community builds appear on Ollama and in quantized GGUF form, but as of October 2026 Ollama’s deepseek-v4.1-flash and deepseek-v4-pro tags are cloud-only. If you are looking for something you can actually run on a workstation rather than a multi-GPU server, start with the R1 distilled models (1.5B to 70B) or the Coder family. The current flagship repositories hold about 510 GB (V4.1-Flash-1017) and 893 GB (V4-Pro-0813) of files — data-centre workloads, not laptop workloads.

How V4 compares on openness

The current releases continue V4’s frontier-tier open-weight approach. DeepSeek does not state parameter counts for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813; the often-quoted figures (V4-Pro 1.6T total / 49B activated, V4-Flash 284B / 13B, both with a one-million-token context) come from the April 2026 preview card, which also reported that in the 1M-token setting the preview V4-Pro needed only 27% of the single-token inference FLOPs and 10% of the KV cache of DeepSeek-V3.2. The V4-Pro-0813 card says that model is built on the preview’s structure with an added DSpark speculative-decoding module.

On capability, DeepSeek’s own numbers are the main reference. The V4.1-Flash-1017 card (17 October 2026) reports, for example, 77.0 on DeepSWE v1.1 against 74.0 for Opus 5 and 73.0 for GPT-5.6 Sol in the same table, while Opus 5 leads on HLE without tools (56.3 against 42.6). These are DeepSeek-reported results — treat them as a starting point, not a final verdict.

How it stacks up against other “open” releases

Model family Weights published License posture Commercial use
DeepSeek V4.1 / V4 / R1 Yes MIT (code + weights) Permitted, no extra conditions beyond the MIT notice
Meta Llama 4 Yes Llama 4 Community License Permitted, but services above 700 million monthly active users must request a license from Meta
Mistral Many models Per model on Mistral’s models page: Apache 2.0 for several (e.g. Mistral Small 4), other terms for others Depends on the model
Qwen3 Yes Apache 2.0 (e.g. Qwen3-8B on Hugging Face) Broad
OpenAI GPT-5 family No (OpenAI’s separate gpt-oss models are Apache 2.0) Proprietary, API-only Via API terms only
Anthropic Claude No Proprietary, API-only Via API terms only
Google Gemini No (the separate Gemma models use the Gemma license) Proprietary; Gemma separate Via API terms only

License details checked on the vendors’ own pages and Hugging Face repos on 24 October 2026. For a deeper head-to-head, see DeepSeek vs Llama on licensing specifics. The practical read: with DeepSeek’s recent releases you can take the weights, fine-tune, and ship a commercial product without a signed agreement.

Is DeepSeek “fully” open source? The honest answer

By the Open Source Initiative’s Open Source AI Definition (version 1.0), a fully open AI system also makes available detailed information about its training data, the complete source code used to train and run it, and its parameters, all under OSI-approved terms. DeepSeek publishes technical reports, weights, inference code and MIT licensing, but it does not publish:

  • The pre-training dataset, or a complete description of it, in a reproducible form.
  • The full training pipeline source.
  • Exact data-mixing recipes.

That puts DeepSeek in the “open-weight, not fully open” bucket by OSAID criteria. For most practical users — developers fine-tuning for a product, researchers studying capabilities, enterprises self-hosting for privacy — open weights plus MIT is what you actually need. If reproducibility is a hard requirement, check whether a release publishes its training data information and training code, not just its weights.

Accessing the models — open weights vs API

Even if you never download the weights, you can use the same models through DeepSeek’s managed API. As of October 2026 it serves two model IDs: deepseek-flash (DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, the only one with image input) and deepseek-v4-pro (DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813). Both are also published as MIT-licensed open weights on Hugging Face.

Chat requests hit POST /chat/completions, the OpenAI-compatible endpoint at https://api.deepseek.com; DeepSeek also offers an Anthropic-compatible interface at https://api.deepseek.com/anthropic. The API is stateless: unlike the web chat and mobile app, which keep your chat history, API clients must resend the full conversation on every request. Thinking mode is a request parameter on either model, on by default, and returns reasoning_content alongside the final content. See the DeepSeek API documentation for setup, code samples and the parameter reference.

API pricing snapshot

Because the weights are open, there is no vendor lock on inference — you can always run the models yourself or pick a third-party host. DeepSeek’s own rates as of October 2026, in USD per million tokens from its official pricing page; off-peak rates are half the peak rates, and peak hours are 01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC, Monday to Friday, excluding Chinese public holidays:

Model Input, cache hit (peak / off-peak) Input, cache miss (peak / off-peak) Output (peak / off-peak)
deepseek-flash $0.006 / $0.003 $0.30 / $0.15 $1.20 / $0.60
deepseek-v4-pro $0.044 / $0.022 $1.32 / $0.66 $3.96 / $1.98

Verify current rates on the official pricing page before committing to a budget; DeepSeek says prices may vary. See our DeepSeek API pricing breakdown for worked examples, or the DeepSeek pricing calculator if you want to cost out your own workload.

Running DeepSeek open source weights locally

Open weights only matter if you can actually run them. The hardware reality is blunt: the current V4.1-Flash and V4-Pro releases are large models that assume multi-GPU inference. If you want something on a single machine, drop down the range — the sizes below are the default (4-bit quantised) Ollama downloads for each distilled model as of October 2026, and you need at least that much free memory plus headroom:

  1. R1 Distill 1.5B – 14B — 1.1 GB to 9.0 GB downloads; the realistic choice for laptops.
  2. R1 Distill 32B — a 20 GB download; a high-memory GPU or a well-equipped workstation.
  3. R1 Distill 70B — a 43 GB download; serious workstation hardware.
  4. Full R1, V3.2, V4.1-Flash, V4-Pro — data-centre only, or managed cloud inference.

Licensing note: the R1 card says the Qwen-based distills derive from Qwen2.5 (originally Apache 2.0) and the Llama-based ones from Llama 3.1 and Llama 3.3, which carry Meta’s licenses. The simplest on-ramp is Ollama. Follow our guide to running DeepSeek on Ollama for a one-command install of a distilled variant. If you prefer containerised deployment, our install DeepSeek locally walkthrough covers Docker and direct Python paths. Confirm your machine meets the minimums in the DeepSeek system requirements reference before downloading tens of gigabytes of weights.

Why does DeepSeek give the weights away?

Illustration: laptop showing a generic code-repository page for a 'Project Starter' template with an MIT License badge; not a DeepSeek repository.

It is a fair question, and the likely answer is a mix of strategy and engineering culture. Open-weight releases drive adoption, surface bugs through community use, build developer mindshare in a space dominated by closed labs, and — not incidentally — put pressure on closed competitors’ pricing. R1’s MIT release in January 2025 drew wide attention, and the V4 and V4.1 releases continue that playbook with frontier-tier models and published efficiency claims.

That doesn’t make DeepSeek a charity. The company monetises through its paid API, which is where much commercial demand lands. Open weights are a lever, not the business.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek open source or open weight?

Both terms apply, but with precision. DeepSeek publishes model weights and inference code on Hugging Face under the MIT License for V4.1-Flash-1017, V4-Pro-0813, V4.1-Flash, V3.2, V3.1 and R1 — that is fully “open weight” and, by most practical definitions, “open source.” It does not publish its training data or full training pipeline, so it does not meet the OSI’s Open Source AI Definition. For commercial use, MIT is enough. See our what is DeepSeek explainer for context.

Can you use DeepSeek commercially without paying?

Yes, if you run the open weights yourself. MIT licensing on V4.1-Flash-1017, V4-Pro-0813, V3.2 and R1 allows commercial deployment, fine-tuning and distillation without royalties or revenue share. You only pay if you use DeepSeek’s hosted API, which has its own pricing tiers. Older weights under the DeepSeek Model License (V3 base/chat, Coder-V2, VL2) also permit commercial use, but you must respect — and pass on — its use-based restrictions.

What license does DeepSeek V4 use?

MIT. Every V4-generation repo on Hugging Face — the April 2026 V4-Pro and V4-Flash previews, V4-Flash-0731, V4-Pro-0813, V4.1-Flash and V4.1-Flash-1017 — states that the repository and the model weights are licensed under the MIT License. See the full DeepSeek V4 model profile for architecture details, including the 1M-token context.

How does DeepSeek’s openness compare to Llama or GPT?

DeepSeek’s recent releases are more permissive than Meta’s Llama 4, whose community license requires services with more than 700 million monthly active users to request a separate license from Meta. They are more open than OpenAI’s GPT-5 or Anthropic’s Claude models, whose weights are not released at all (OpenAI’s separate gpt-oss models are open-weight under Apache 2.0). For a head-to-head on licensing and capabilities, see DeepSeek vs Llama.

Can you fine-tune DeepSeek on your own data?

Yes. The MIT License on the V4 generation and R1 permits modifications and derivative works, and the R1 card says the series allows any modifications and derivative works, including distillation. The DeepSeek Model License on older weights also allows fine-tuning for lawful purposes, subject to its use-based restrictions. Fine-tuned models are yours to deploy commercially or keep private. Our fine-tuning DeepSeek tutorial covers the practical workflow with LoRA and full-parameter approaches.

Sources & Methodology

Last source check: October 24, 2026

Primary sources

Technical references

Context sources

Methodology

Information in this article was checked against the official DeepSeek documentation, the article's cited primary sources, and the deepseekai.guide pricing dataset on the date shown above. Where third-party numbers are quoted, the originating source is linked inline so the reader can verify and re-check.

Data confidence

High for facts cited inline with primary-source links; medium for context narrative.

Editorial note

AI tooling moves quickly. If you spot an outdated number or a broken link, the contact link in the footer is the fastest way to flag it for the editorial team.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *